Who is Vivek Chaand Sehgal?

Vivek Chaand Sehgal is the founder and non-executive chairman of the Samvardhana Motherson Group, one of the world's largest car-parts suppliers. He started Motherson with his mother, Swaran Lata Sehgal, in Delhi in 1975.

What is Vivek Chaand Sehgal's net worth in 2026?

Forbes valued Vivek Chaand Sehgal and family at US$8.9 billion in September 2026, ranking them No. 27 on its India's Richest 2026 list. The M3M Hurun India Rich List 2026 put the family's wealth at Rs 82,000 crore, according to Outlook Money.

How did Vivek Chaand Sehgal start Motherson?

As a teenager he moved silver for his grandfather's trade, then founded Motherson with his mother in 1975 and began making cables in 1977. The break came in 1983 when he started making wiring parts for Maruti, which led to a 1986 joint venture with Japan's Sumitomo Wiring Systems.

Where is Vivek Chaand Sehgal from and what is his citizenship?

He was born in Delhi in 1956. A 2016 Motherson offer document describes him as an Australian citizen; Forbes lists his residence as Delhi, while Hurun lists Melbourne.

What is Vivek Chaand Sehgal's education?

He is reported to hold a bachelor's degree from the University of Delhi. He has said he was not very good at studies, which is why his mother suggested going into business.

Who will succeed Vivek Chaand Sehgal at Motherson?

His son, Laksh Vaaman Sehgal, Vice Chairman of the Motherson Group and a director of Samvardhana Motherson International since 2009, is the named successor. In 2020 Sehgal said his job was to teach his son everything he could.

Has Vivek Chaand Sehgal faced any controversy?

His record is relatively quiet. The main debate was over the 2020-22 group restructuring, which some analysts said valued the family's holding company richly; minority shareholders and the NCLT approved it. Motherson also won a US patent case brought by Magna.

Vivek Chaand Sehgal: Motherson Founder's Story

Key facts
Born	1956, Delhi (28 September 1956 per a 2015 conference biography; some references give 1 February 1957) [21] [18]
Family roots	Delhi. Mother Swaran Lata Sehgal co-founded Motherson with him; his father worked in government, described as a mining engineer; his mother’s family were jewellers and silver traders [22] [23]
Education	Bachelor’s degree, University of Delhi (as reported) [37]
Family	Son Laksh Vaaman Sehgal is Vice Chairman of the Motherson Group; Forbes lists him as widowed with two children [18] [63]
Citizenship	Australian citizen, per a 2016 company offer document [7]
Company	Founder and Non-Executive Chairman, Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd (SAMIL); also a promoter of Motherson Sumi Wiring India Ltd [1]
Wealth	US$8.9 billion, No. 27 on Forbes’s India’s Richest 2026 list (Sep 2026) [18]; Rs 82,000 crore with family on the M3M Hurun India Rich List 2026, as reported by Outlook Money [19]
Known for	Turning a 1975 silver-trading and cable venture into one of the world’s largest car-parts suppliers, with 53 companies bought since 2002 [5]

One evening in 1983, a young Delhi businessman got a small plastic part from Maruti Udyog. It was a T-connector, used in the wiring of the car that would become the Maruti 800. There was no drawing. Maruti wanted copies, and it wanted them fast [22].

Vivek Chaand Sehgal, then in his mid-20s, went to a machinist named Avatar Singh. Singh agreed to make the tool, but he had one condition. “First, you go and get three quarts of whiskey,” Sehgal later recalled [22].

The two men worked from about 9.30 pm until well after 1 am. The next afternoon, Sehgal handed Maruti two dozen copies [22].

That small part opened a big door. Within three years, Sehgal and his mother had a joint venture with a Japanese wiring company. Within 25 years, they had bought a European mirror maker larger than themselves. Today the company they started in 1975 has more than 2,05,000 employees and over 475 facilities in 47 countries [5]. In 2025-26 its consolidated revenue was about Rs 1.26 lakh crore [63].

Forbes put Sehgal’s fortune at US$8.9 billion in September 2026 [18]. Yet most Indians have never seen him speak. He gives few interviews, holds Australian citizenship [7] and calls himself a man who will “retire when I go on four shoulders” [23].

The record also has a harder side. He missed two of his own five-year targets by a wide margin [2]. Debt-funded deals hurt returns for years [36]. A 2020 group restructuring drew criticism that it favoured the family’s holding company [56]. This is the full story, as far as the public record shows it.

Where it began

A mother, a son and a silver shop

Vivek Chaand Sehgal was born in Delhi in 1956. A speaker biography published for Japan’s Nikkei Global Management Forum in 2015 gives his birth date as 28 September 1956 [21]. Some online references give 1 February 1957 instead. The ages printed by Forbes (70 in September 2026) fit the 1956 date [18].

His father worked for the government. Quartz described him as “a government mining engineer” [22]. That one fact shaped the business. “Because my father was in the government, my mother and I started the company,” Sehgal told Quartz [22]. Bloomberg reported that his father’s side of the family had worked in the film business, while his mother’s side were jewellers [23].

His mother, Swaran Lata Sehgal, is the other founder of Motherson. The company still lists her as its late “Founder Chairperson” and describes the group as “a partnership between my mother Late Shrimati Swaran Lata Sehgal and me” [4] [1].

He has been frank about his schooldays. “I wasn’t very good in studies, so my mother was very worried about me. So she said let’s get into business,” he told Bloomberg in 2020 [23]. He is reported to hold a bachelor’s degree from the University of Delhi [37].

One rupee a kilo

His first job was moving silver. As a teenager he carried silver for his grandfather, earning about one rupee for every kilogram he transported [23]. Business Today reported that at 18 he was earning around Rs 2,500 a month. That was more than his father’s government salary at the time [25]. His college was near the airport, so he handled the paperwork and customs clearance for the trade [26].

Business Today linked the boom to the American Hunt brothers, who were buying silver across the world. When they pulled out, the silver trade dried up and Sehgal looked for something else [25].

“It sounded like a nappy manufacturer”

Mother and son registered Motherson in 1975. Autocar Professional gives the founding date as 6 December 1975 [26]. Fortune India reported a seed capital of just Rs 1,000 [27].

The name means what it sounds like: mother and son. The company says his father suggested it [3]. Sehgal did not like it at first. “It sounded like a nappy (diaper) manufacturer,” he told Mint in 2015, as reported by The Columbia Review. “But today, if you offer (me) a trillion dollars, I won’t sell the name” [29].

His mother set the rules for sharing profit. As Sehgal recalled to Fortune India, she said it would be “six-three — six parts for me, three for you and one part will always be for Lord Krishna” [27]. Faith stayed central to how he works. Business Today reported that he says morning prayers daily and keeps a temple in each factory [25].

Straws or wires?

The young Sehgal briefly thought of making plastic drinking straws. His father steered him towards wire and cable instead [22]. In 1977 the family started a cable unit that made domestic and power-control cables [26] [30].

The early years were hard. “We had a horrible time from ’77 till ’82,” he told Quartz. “Nobody really wanted so much of quality” [22].

The first break

Maruti and the race to localise

Everything changed with Maruti Udyog. The government-backed carmaker began production with Suzuki in 1983, and it wanted local suppliers for every part. About 600 vendors were competing for orders [31].

Motherson’s own history tells a second version of the start. When Sehgal learnt that a Japanese company had designed the wiring of the Maruti 800, he flew to Tokyo within ten days. The company would not show him its factory, so he brought back samples and reproduced them. Motherson harnesses were on display when the Maruti plant was inaugurated [3].

Speed was his edge. A friend told him that localising a part would take at least 15 days. “We did not have that time,” Sehgal told Business Standard [31].

The Japanese partner

In 1983 Motherson signed a technical agreement with Tokai Electric, the company that later became Sumitomo Wiring Systems (SWS), part of Japan’s Sumitomo Electric group [6] [22]. Three years later the two turned it into a joint venture.

Motherson Sumi Systems Ltd (MSSL) was incorporated on 19 December 1986 to make wiring harnesses in India. It became a public limited company on 29 April 1987 [7] [6]. Sehgal has been a director of it since the day it was born [1].

He gives the Japanese much of the credit. “For me, if they (the Japanese) weren’t there, probably I wouldn’t have made it,” he told Quartz [22]. Sumitomo supplied wire, terminal, connector and fuse-box technology and precision moulding tools. That let Motherson make more of its own parts [26]. Sehgal also learnt a lesson he still repeats: a Japanese partner once told him, “Look Mr Sehgal, we don’t pick up any part because it’s 10% cheaper” [22].

One customer, 80% of sales

The Maruti link made Motherson. It also made it fragile. Until the mid-1990s, about 80% of its revenue came from Maruti [25] [32]. Maruti’s chairman R.C. Bhargava later said of Sehgal: “He has the ability to look at what opportunities are coming his way and make use of it” [25].

MSSL listed on the stock market on 9 September 1993. Its first trade was at Rs 41 on a Rs 10 share [6] [34]. Sehgal later said the company had a top line of only about Rs 14 crore at the time of its IPO [27].

Owner, not manager

In 1995 Sehgal did something unusual for an Indian promoter. He stepped down as managing director and put professionals in charge [27] [22]. “The ability to free the entrepreneur mind and allow professionals to run the company is very, very important,” he told Quartz [22].

He also banned relatives from jobs. “There are no uncles and aunts here. If you are related to me, you aren’t allowed in this company,” he told Outlook Business [35]. (His son would later be the one exception, as a director and group leader, not an executive of the listed company.)

The same year he set the first of his five-year plans. The aim was ten times the revenue. “Everyone thought I was crazy,” he told Fortune India. “Six of our top executives resigned because they didn’t believe it could be done” [27]. Motherson did not hit 10x, but it grew several times over. Sales were about Rs 10 crore in 1996 [30]. By 2005 they were Rs 1,029 crore [2].

The 1990s also brought new customers. Tata trucks came in 1991. Motherson supplied Mercedes-Benz in India, built a plant for it in 39 days, and began exporting to Hyundai and Ford. In 1999 it opened its first overseas office, in Graz, Austria [3].

Building the empire

The five-year plans

From 2000, the five-year plans went public. Each one set a target for revenue, return on capital and the share of sales from outside India. Motherson publishes every target next to what it actually achieved [2].

Plan	Revenue target	What it achieved
2000-05	Rs 1,000 crore	Rs 1,029 crore
2005-10	US$1 billion	US$1.5 billion
2010-15	US$5 billion	US$5.5 billion
2015-20	US$18 billion	US$8.9 billion
2020-25	US$36 billion	US$25.7 billion (pro forma)

Source: Motherson, Five-year plans page [2].

The first three plans were met. The next two were badly missed, as the setbacks section explains.

Alongside the numbers came a rule. In 2013 Sehgal described it as “3CX15”: no commodity, country or company should make up more than 15% of revenue [32]. It later tightened to “3CX10”: “No country, customer or component should contribute more than 10% to our revenues” [4]. In 2026 India was still about 22% of revenue and wiring harnesses 25%, so the goal has not yet been reached [67].

Small buys first

The first purchase abroad was Wexford Electronics in Ireland, in 2002. Over the next five years Motherson bought Reiner Precision, G&S Kunststofftechnik and Formagrau in Germany, ASL Systems in Britain, and Huon and Empire Rubber in Australia [38].

The Australian deals mattered for another reason. Sehgal later took Australian citizenship, and The Australian Financial Review now counts him among the country’s richest people [7] [39].

The Lehman-crisis bet: Visiocorp

The deal that changed Motherson’s size came in the worst month to buy anything. In March 2009, as world markets collapsed after the Lehman Brothers failure, Motherson bought Visiocorp, a loss-making British maker of rear-view mirrors with 16 plants [40].

The price was about Rs 176 crore, according to Autocar Professional [40]. The buyer was a joint venture: 51% MSSL and 49% Samvardhana Motherson Finance Ltd (SMFL), the Sehgal family’s holding company [40]. The renamed SMR roughly doubled the group’s turnover, from US$806 million to more than US$1.6 billion [40]. The target was bigger than the buyer [30].

“One of the biggest assets (SMR) that we bought was during the Lehman crisis, when there was total chaos all around,” Sehgal said later [41]. He was also lucky. “On March 9, markets started moving up finally, so the timing was really good,” he told Outlook Business [35].

He put his 26-year-old son in charge. Laksh Vaaman Sehgal recalled the moment his father named the new CEO: “When he pointed towards me, I actually looked back to see if someone was standing behind me” [33].

Peguform: the big German gamble

In 2011 Motherson went after something much larger. It bought 80% of Peguform, a German maker of bumpers, dashboards and other plastic modules, mainly for Volkswagen. The price was €72.2 million, valuing the company at €141.5 million. The seller, Cross Industries, kept 20% [42]. Once again the buyer was a 51:49 joint venture between MSSL and the family company [42]. Peguform became SMP.

Peguform was barely profitable, with margins under 2% [43]. The deal sent the group’s debt soaring, and for a while investors wondered whether Sehgal had overreached (see the setbacks section).

He saw it differently. “In essence, we are like doctors. In every unit, we sit down and understand what is wrong; then we try to change that,” he told Outlook Business [35]. He also rejected the word “bets”. “That makes me a gambler” [35].

The acquisition machine

Over the next 15 years Motherson bought companies at a pace few Indian firms have matched. The main deals, with prices where they have been reported:

2014: the wiring harness business of Stoneridge (US) for US$65.7 million (Rs 390 crore), with six plants in the US and Mexico; and Germany’s Scherer & Trier for €36 million [45].
2017: PKC Group of Finland, a wiring-harness maker for trucks, for €571 million (US$619 million) — then Motherson’s biggest deal [46].
2018: Reydel Automotive, an interiors maker with 20 plants in 16 countries, bought from Cerberus for US$201 million [17].
2023: the SAS cockpit-module business from France’s Forvia (Faurecia) at an enterprise value of €540 million [47]; 81% of Honda’s Yachiyo Industry four-wheeler business for Rs 1,059 crore [48]; the assets of bankrupt US plating firm Bolta [49]; and aerospace and medical firms including France’s AD Industries and Cirma [50].
2024-25: 95% of Honda group’s Atsumitec, a gear-shifter maker, for US$57 million [51].
2026: Nexans Autoelectric, a German wiring-harness maker with nearly 13,000 staff, at an enterprise value of €207 million, completed in July [16]; and 81% of Honda group’s Yutaka Giken for about ¥27 billion, completed on 21 July 2026 [52].

By August 2026, the company counted 53 companies acquired since 2002 [5]. It says 16 of them came between September 2022 and 2025 alone [4].

“Where our customers go, we will follow”

Sehgal’s deal rule is simple, and he repeats it often: buy what customers ask you to buy. “One thing that’s consistent in all our acquisitions is that they are always customer-nominated,” he told Fortune India [28]. “Most of the companies we buy are troubled assets that others won’t touch” [27].

He knows the risk. “Acquisitions are double-edged knives. An asset might seem cheap, but it can cut both ways,” he said [28]. He also does not like joint ventures as much as he once did. “Once you own the company, then you have the complete freedom to go anywhere,” he said in 2025 [53].

His other line has become famous among Indian analysts: “Top-line vanity, bottom-line sanity,” with cash in the bank as “reality” [30].

The great reorganisation (2020-22)

By 2020 the group was a tangle. MSSL owned 51% of the big overseas businesses. The family’s unlisted company, also called Samvardhana Motherson International (SAMIL), owned the other 49% and 33.4% of MSSL itself [54].

On 2 July 2020 the boards approved a two-step clean-up [55]:

The domestic wiring harness business, the original Maruti-era business, was demerged into a new listed company, Motherson Sumi Wiring India Ltd (MSWIL). The new company kept the Sumitomo partnership.
The family company SAMIL was merged into MSSL. SAMIL’s shareholders got 51 MSSL shares for every 10 SAMIL shares. MSSL then took the name Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd.

The scheme passed a shareholder vote in April 2021, cleared the Competition Commission under its fast-track route, and was sanctioned by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in December 2021 [57] [11]. MSWIL listed on 28 March 2022. Sehgal called the wiring business “the foundation on which the group was built over the years” [59].

The Japanese partner then stepped back. Sumitomo Wiring Systems sold blocks of shares in 2023 and 2024, including a 4.43% stake for Rs 3,633 crore in March 2024, and was later reclassified from promoter to public shareholder [60]. It still holds about 9.4% of SAMIL and 25.1% of MSWIL [8] [9].

In September 2024 SAMIL raised Rs 6,438 crore through a qualified institutional placement, mainly to repay debt [61]. In 2025, its 50th anniversary year, it issued one bonus share for every two held [62].

Where it stands in 2026

In 2025-26 (the year to 31 March 2026), SAMIL reported [63]:

consolidated revenue of Rs 1,26,104 crore;
net profit of Rs 4,086 crore;
a leverage ratio of 0.8 times, which the company called the lowest in its history;
booked future business of US$96 billion.

In the July-September 2026 quarter, revenue rose 27% to Rs 38,280 crore and reported profit rose 44% [10] [64]. The company’s market value was about Rs 1.68 lakh crore in early November 2026 [65].

Motherson now makes wiring harnesses, mirrors, bumpers, dashboards, sunroofs, lights and much more. It also has businesses in aerospace, medical devices, logistics, IT services and consumer electronics. These “emerging businesses” earned Rs 17,072 crore in 2025-26 [5].

The new plan, its seventh, aims for US$108 billion of gross revenue by 2029-30, with a 40% return on capital [2] [66]. “We’ve never adjusted a vision number once it was set,” Sehgal said when he announced it [66].

How the wealth is held

Sehgal’s fortune is mostly his family’s stake in SAMIL. At 31 December 2025, the promoter group owned 48.6% of SAMIL [8]. The main holdings were:

Holder	Share of SAMIL
Sehgal Family Trust	13.22%
Vivek Chaand Sehgal directly	12.49%
Renu Sehgal Trust	11.96%
Radha Rani Holdings Pte Ltd (Singapore)	7.33%
Other promoter entities and relatives	about 3.6%

Source: SAMIL shareholding pattern, 31 December 2025 [8].

The filing classifies Sehgal as a foreign promoter. About 1.4% of SAMIL’s shares, all held by Radha Rani Holdings, were pledged [8]. The family also holds a direct stake in MSWIL, where SAMIL owns 33.4% [9].

Rich lists put the result in different places. Forbes valued Sehgal and family at US$8.9 billion in September 2026, ranking them No. 27 on India’s Richest 2026 [18]. The M3M Hurun India Rich List 2026, released on 23 September 2026, valued them at Rs 82,000 crore and ranked them seventh among non-resident Indians, based in Melbourne, according to Outlook Money’s summary of the list [19]. A year earlier, Hurun had put the family at Rs 57,060 crore [20].

Where he actually lives is reported differently. Forbes lists his residence as Delhi [18]. Hurun lists Melbourne [19]. Mint reported in 2015 that he lived in Dubai [29]. He travels much of the year; Forbes India once said about 300 days [32].

The setbacks and failures

Debt after Peguform

The Peguform deal hurt for years. Group debt rose from Rs 1,263 crore in 2010-11 to Rs 4,883 crore by September 2012, and interest costs nearly tripled, Outlook Business reported [36]. Four Peguform plants were losing money. The return on capital fell from 19.7% to 12% in a year [43]. Rating agency ICRA said the group’s capital structure and profits had weakened [36].

Sehgal had also pledged about 40% of his holding in the parent at the time [36]. On an analyst call he refused to be rushed. “You have to ask the OEMs the question, boss… We are not a quarter-on-quarter company,” he said [36].

The deal worked out in the long run. SMP became a core part of the group. But it was a close-run thing.

The IPO that failed

In May 2012 the family’s holding company, Samvardhana Motherson Finance, tried to raise about Rs 1,665 crore through an IPO. Investors applied for only 23% of the shares on offer. The company withdrew the issue [44].

Volkswagen’s scandal

In September 2015 Volkswagen admitted cheating on diesel emissions tests. Volkswagen then made up 44% of Motherson’s consolidated revenue. Motherson shares fell 7.7% in a day [68]. It was a lesson in why the 3CX rule existed.

Two missed targets

The 2015-20 plan aimed for US$18 billion of revenue and a 40% return on capital. Motherson reached US$8.9 billion and a 10% return, by its own count [2]. (Press estimates of the gap vary because they use different measures of revenue; Bloomberg put sales at under US$12 billion [24].) Bloomberg called it the only miss in 25 years of five-year plans. The share price fell almost 60% over the period [24].

Part of the reason was costly new plants. In 2015 the group announced factories near Daimler’s sites in Kecskemét, Hungary, and Tuscaloosa, Alabama [69]. Start-up losses at these “greenfield” plants and the cost of absorbing Reydel squeezed margins in 2018-20 [70] [71]. In February 2020 S&P moved its outlook on a key Motherson subsidiary to negative [72].

The 2020-25 plan, to reach US$36 billion, was also missed. The company reported US$25.7 billion on a pro forma basis and a 17.2% return on capital [2]. Mint noted the gap when the next plan was launched [73].

COVID and chips

The April-June 2020 quarter was a disaster. Revenue fell 49% to Rs 8,431 crore and the company made a loss. Business Standard reported a consolidated loss of Rs 1,192 crore; Autocar Professional reported Rs 810 crore, a figure that appears to reflect a different measure [74] [75]. Sehgal called the quarter “a complete write-off” [75].

In 2021 the global chip shortage cut car production in Europe, and revenue at the main overseas arm fell 13.6% in one quarter [76].

Europe and tariffs

The German Dr. Schneider business, bought out of insolvency in 2023, needed deep restructuring. More than 400 job cuts were expected at Kronach-Neuses [77], and the Judenbach plant was wound down in 2025 [78].

In 2025 new US tariffs on imported cars and parts hit again. Profit for the April-June 2025 quarter fell 46% to Rs 606 crore. Sehgal said most US sales met the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement’s rules and that passing on costs was “in progress” [79]. Profit recovered strongly later in the year [64].

He rarely admits strategic errors in public. Asked about acquisitions, he told Fortune India: “In our entire history, only one company didn’t perform well, and that was during COVID” [28].

Controversies and allegations

Compared with many Indian business families, Sehgal’s public record is quiet. CapitalVia searched for SEBI, RBI, ED, CBI and SFIO orders, income tax searches, cartel findings, short-seller reports and leaked-papers coverage involving Sehgal or Motherson, and found none reported by courts, regulators or major publications. What the record does show is set out below.

The 2020 restructuring and the valuation debate

Allegation: When the boards approved the reorganisation in July 2020, some analysts said the deal favoured the promoter family. Antique Stock Broking said the valuations were “skewed” towards the family-held SAMIL and based on peak 2018-19 earnings. ICICI Securities called the SAMIL purchase “expensive” relative to MSSL’s own valuation. The new shares meant about 43% dilution for MSSL’s existing shareholders, and the stock fell about 9% in a day [55] [56].

Response: Other brokers disagreed. IIFL said the valuation was fair or even low, and Motilal Oswal said the split gave minority investors more choice. The split of the domestic wiring business was reported to have been requested by Sumitomo [56]. The company said the scheme simplified the group and gave MSSL full ownership of its overseas businesses [54].

What happened next:

Public (non-promoter) shareholders approved the scheme at an NCLT-convened meeting in April 2021 [57].
The Competition Commission approved it in May 2021 [58].
The NCLT sanctioned the scheme in December 2021, and it took effect in January 2022 [11].

Status: Completed in 2022. No court challenge to the scheme was reported.

Labour disputes

Allegation: In August 2019 about 500 permanent workers went on strike at a Motherson unit near Sriperumbudur, Tamil Nadu. They demanded union recognition, a minimum wage of Rs 18,000 and an end to what they alleged was victimisation. Workers reported suspensions and show-cause notices [80]. Workers at the same unit planned another strike in 2021 [81].

In April 2026 wage protests by factory workers in Noida turned violent. Unrest was reported to be particularly intense near Motherson-linked plants, where workers cited base pay of about Rs 12,000 a month [82]. (For context, see CapitalVia’s look at profit versus pay in Indian factories.)

Response: Motherson Sumi Wiring India told the stock exchanges that the Noida unrest was “a broader labour issue… driven by misinformation being spread about wage revisions” and had “no material impact” on its operations [82]. The Wire reported that the protests had started at other factories before spreading [83].

What happened next:

The Uttar Pradesh government raised minimum wages by about 20% in April 2026 [83].

Status: The 2019 strike’s outcome was not clearly reported in mainstream media. The 2026 protests were a region-wide dispute, not one aimed at Motherson alone. No finding has been made against the company.

The Magna patent lawsuit

Allegation: In 2017 Canadian rival Magna sued SMR, Motherson’s mirror business, in a US federal court in Michigan. Magna alleged that SMR’s blind-spot side mirrors infringed its patents and sought at least US$24 million [84].

Response: SMR denied infringement and argued that Magna’s patents were invalid [84].

What happened next:

In December 2022 a jury found no infringement by any SMR company and found all five patent claims invalid [84].
Magna’s appeal ended in April 2023 when the two companies ended the dispute [85].

Status: Concluded in Motherson’s favour.

Tax and regulatory penalties

Allegation: Like most large multinationals, Motherson companies face routine tax claims. Recent ones disclosed to the exchanges include a Rs 38.8 lakh GST penalty over guarantee commission (November 2025) and a US$48,432 Michigan tax penalty on SMR’s US unit (September 2026) [12] [13]. In 2018 the Delhi High Court ruled in the family company’s favour in a dispute over reopened income tax assessments [86].

Response: The company called the GST penalty unjustified, saying it had already paid the tax under another state registration, and said it would appeal. It accepted and paid the Michigan penalty [12] [13].

Status: Small and immaterial to the group’s size; the GST matter is under appeal.

The wire-harness cartel probe

Allegation: Between 2010 and 2013, competition regulators in the US, Europe and Japan investigated a global cartel among car wiring-harness makers. The European Commission fined Yazaki, Furukawa, Leoni and S-Y Systems in 2013 [14]. Companies of the Sumitomo Electric group, of which Motherson’s Japanese partner is a part, were among the defendants named in US class actions [15] [7].

Response: Motherson was not a party. No Motherson company was named in the European Commission’s decision or in the US class-action complaint [14] [15].

Status: No finding against Motherson or Sehgal. The case is mentioned here only because his partner’s involvement is sometimes confused with Motherson’s.

Status of this section as of 10 November 2026.

Giving back

Sehgal’s giving is mostly done through the company, not in his own name. He has not appeared on the EdelGive Hurun India Philanthropy List in 2024 or 2025 [87].

Motherson’s social spending runs through the Swarn Lata Motherson Trust, named after his late mother. In 2024-25 SAMIL’s legal CSR obligation was Rs 18.80 crore. It spent Rs 9.63 crore during the year and moved about Rs 9.17 crore into an unspent CSR account for ongoing projects, as Indian law allows [88].

The projects focus on jobs and health. They include skill-development centres in Noida and Chennai, a livelihood project in Chennai, waste-segregation drives, cleft-lip surgeries for children and mobile cancer screening [88] [89]. MSWIL supports causes such as the Nanhi Kali girls’ education programme and Olympic Gold Quest [90].

Succession

The plan is clear. Laksh Vaaman Sehgal, his son, is Vice Chairman of the Motherson Group and a non-executive director of SAMIL since 2009 [1] [63]. He studied at Keio University in Tokyo and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School [1].

Laksh trained on factory floors in Germany and Thailand, ran the mirror business SMR from 2009, and later led SMP [33] [91]. He now leads the push into aerospace, consumer electronics and semiconductors, according to the 360 ONE Wealth Creators List [92].

In 2020 Sehgal told Bloomberg: “My job is to teach everything that I can to my son. The next five-year plan is my handing over to him” [24]. That plan has now ended. Sehgal, 70, is still chairman and still speaks on earnings calls [18] [63].

The family model is unusual. Neither father nor son runs a company day to day. “Neither my son Vaman nor I are the president or managing director of any company,” Sehgal told Fortune India. “The ability to distinguish between ownership and management is crucial for any family business” [28]. Day-to-day work is led by professionals such as whole-time director Pankaj Mital and group CFO Gandharv Tongia [93].

What his journey teaches

Say “not yet” instead of “no”. Sehgal calls Motherson a “not yet” company: customers only ever hear “yes” or “not yet” [26]. That habit turned a Maruti T-connector into a global wiring business.

A strong partner can teach you more than money can. He openly says he would not have made it without the Japanese [22]. The Sumitomo link gave a small Delhi firm technology, discipline and credibility with carmakers.

Separate owning from running. He stepped down as managing director in 1995, in his late thirties, and kept relatives out of jobs [27] [35]. That made it easier to hire strong managers and plug in dozens of acquired companies.

Buy in a crisis, but only what a customer wants. Visiocorp was bought as markets crashed in 2009, and nearly every later deal was “customer-nominated” [41] [28]. Discipline about who is asking matters as much as the price.

Big targets cut both ways. His five-year plans pushed the company hard, but two were missed badly, and debt-funded growth cost shareholders years of weak returns [2] [36]. Ambition works best with an honest scoreboard, which Motherson, to its credit, publishes.

Concentration is a hidden risk. Maruti once made up 80% of sales and Volkswagen 44% [25] [68]. The 3CX rule exists because Sehgal learnt this the hard way.

Other profiles in this series include fellow auto-parts builder Baba Kalyani, and Venu Srinivasan of TVS and Brijmohan Lall Munjal of Hero, who also grew alongside Japanese partners.

A profile for general reading, based on public records and reporting as of 10 November 2026. Not investment, tax or legal advice.

Vivek Chaand Sehgal: Motherson Founder's Story

Where it began

A mother, a son and a silver shop

One rupee a kilo

“It sounded like a nappy manufacturer”

Straws or wires?

The first break

Maruti and the race to localise

The Japanese partner

One customer, 80% of sales

Owner, not manager

Building the empire

The five-year plans

Small buys first

The Lehman-crisis bet: Visiocorp

Peguform: the big German gamble

The acquisition machine

“Where our customers go, we will follow”

The great reorganisation (2020-22)

Where it stands in 2026

How the wealth is held

The setbacks and failures

Debt after Peguform

The IPO that failed

Volkswagen’s scandal

Two missed targets

COVID and chips

Europe and tariffs

Controversies and allegations

The 2020 restructuring and the valuation debate

Labour disputes

The Magna patent lawsuit

Tax and regulatory penalties

The wire-harness cartel probe

Giving back

Succession

What his journey teaches

Sources (93)

Frequently asked questions

More stories